4.8 Article

Dinitrogen-Molybdenum Complex Induces Dinitrogen Cleavage by One-Electron Oxidation

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 58, 期 33, 页码 11279-11284

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201905299

关键词

dinitrogen; molybdenum; oxidation; reaction mechanisms; structure elucidation

资金

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) through the Advanced Research Program for Energy and Environmental Technologies
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Program for Advancing Strategic International Networks to Accelerate the Circulation of Talented Researchers from the Ministry of Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan (MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI) [15J09325, 16H04117, 17K05808, 15K05606]
  3. Nantotechnology Platform Program (Molecule and Material Synthesis) of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15J09325, 16H04117, 17K05808, 15K05606] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reported here is the N-2 cleavage of a one-electron oxidation reaction using trans-[Mo(depe)(2)(N-2)(2)] (1) (depe=Et2PCH2CH2PEt2), which is a classical molybdenum(0)-dinitrogen complex supported by two bidentate phosphine ligands. The molybdenum(IV) terminal nitride complex [Mo(depe)(2)N][BArf(4)] (2) (BArf(4)=B(3,5-(CF3)(2)C6H3)(4)) is synthesized by the one-electron oxidation of 1 upon addition of a mild oxidant, [Cp2Fe][BArf(4)] (Cp=C5H5), and proceeds by N-2 cleavage from a Mo-II-N=N-Mo-II structure. In addition, the electrochemical oxidation reaction for 1 also cleaved the N-2 ligand to give 2. The dimeric Mo complex with a bridging N-2 is detected by in situ resonance Raman and in situ UV-vis spectroscopies during the electrochemical oxidation reaction for 1. Density-functional theory (DFT) calculations reveal that the unstable monomeric oxidized Mo-I species is converted into 2 via the dimeric structure involving a zigzag transition state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据