4.7 Article

Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride using a palygorskite-supported Cu2O-TiO2 composite

期刊

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 311-320

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.10.033

关键词

Palygorskite; Cu2O; TiO2; Adsorption; Photocatalysis; Solar light

资金

  1. Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse of China [2013B-001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51308282]
  3. Foundation Research Project of Jiangsu Province (Natural Science Foundation of China)-Youth Fund Project [BK20130574]
  4. Research Subject of Environmental Protection Department of Jiangsu Province [2013031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A palygorskite (Pal)-supported Cu2O-TiO2 heterojunction composite (Cu2O-TiO2-Pal) was successfully prepared. The morphology, structure and chemical composition of the composite was characterized, and the adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride using this composite was also investigated. The results showed that a layer of TiO2-Cu2O was successfully loaded on the surface of Pal. The Cu2O-TiO2-Pal composite had a specific surface area of 93 m(2).g(-1) mesoporous features, and a uniform slit channel. The composite possessed twofold removal ability to TC, including adsorptive capability for the separation and solar-light illuminate photocatalytic in degradation. The maximum adsorption capacity of Cu2O-TiO2-Pal for TC was 113.6 mg.g(-1) at 20 degrees C as calculated by the Langmuir model. The pseudo-first-order degradation rate constant of 50 mL of TC with an initial concentration of 30 mg.L-1 reached 0.0129 min(-1) when the Cu2O-TiO2-Pal concentration was 1.0 g.L-1. The total removal rate of TC reached 88.81% in the presence of Cu2O-TiO2-Pal. In addition, the composite could be regenerated by calcination at 400 degrees C and recycled more than three times, which is useful for practical applications. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据