4.6 Article

miR-24 Is Elevated in Ulcerative Colitis Patients and Regulates Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Function

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 189, 期 9, 页码 1763-1774

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.05.018

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R0I-DK110003-02, DK60729, DK47373]
  2. Center for Ulcer Research and Education - Digestive Disease Research Core Center [DK4I301]
  3. University of California Los Angeles - Clinical and Translational Science Institute [ULITR0001881]
  4. CCF Career Development award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inflammatory bowel disease is characterized by high levels of inflammation and loss of barrier integrity in the colon. The intestinal barrier is a dynamic network of proteins that encircle intestinal epithelial cells. miRNAs regulate protein-coding genes. In this study, miR-24 was found to be elevated in colonic biopsies and blood samples from ulcerative colitis (UC) patients compared with healthy controls. In the colon of UC patients, miR-24 is localized to intestinal epithelial cells, which prompted an investigation of intestinal epithelial barrier function. Two intestinal epithelial cell lines were used to study the effect of miR-24 overexpression on barrier integrity. Overexpression of miR-24 in both cell lines led to diminished transepithelial electrical resistance and increased dextran flux, suggesting an effect on barrier integrity. Overexpression of miR-24 did not induce apoptosis or affect cell proliferation, suggesting that the effect of miR-24 on barrier function was due to an effect on cell-cell junctions. Although the tight junctions in cells overexpressing miR-24 appeared normal, miR-24 overexpression led to a decrease in the tight junction-associated protein cingulin. Loss of cingulin compromised barrier formation; cingulin levels negatively correlated with disease severity in UC patients. Together, these data suggest that miR-24 is a significant regulator of intestinal barrier that may be important in the pathogenesis of UC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据