4.1 Article

Differentially methylated regions in bipolar disorder and suicide

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32754

关键词

ARHGEF38; opioid signaling; suicidal behavior; beta-adrenergic signaling

资金

  1. American Foundation for Suicide Prevention [PDF-0-067-12]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [R21 MH096154]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The addition of a methyl group to, typically, a cytosine-guanine dinucleotide (CpG) creates distinct DNA methylation patterns across the genome that can regulate gene expression. Aberrant DNA methylation of CpG sites has been associated with many psychiatric disorders including bipolar disorder (BD) and suicide. Using the SureSelect(XT) system, Methyl-Seq, we investigated the DNA methylation status of CpG sites throughout the genome in 50 BD individuals (23 subjects who died by suicide and 27 subjects who died from other causes) and 31 nonpsychiatric controls. We identified differentially methylated regions (DMRs) from three analyses: (a) BD subjects compared to nonpsychiatric controls (BD-NC), (b) BD subjects who died by suicide compared to nonpsychiatric controls (BDS-NC), and (c) BDS subjects compared to BD subjects who died from other causes (BDS-BDNS). One DMR from the BDS-NC analysis, located in ARHGEF38, was significantly hypomethylated (23.4%) in BDS subjects. This finding remained significant after multiple testing (P-Bootstrapped = 9.0 x 10(-3)), was validated using pyrosequencing, and was more significant in males. A secondary analysis utilized Ingenuity Pathway Analysis to identify enrichment in nominally significant DMRs. This identified an association with several pathways including axonal guidance signaling, calcium signaling, beta-adrenergic signaling, and opioid signaling. Our comprehensive study provides further support that DNA methylation alterations influence the risk for BD and suicide. However, further investigation is required to confirm these associations and identify their functional consequences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据