4.8 Article

Catalytic supercritical gasification of biocrude from hydrothermal liquefaction of cattle manure

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 189, 期 -, 页码 119-132

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.02.032

关键词

Supercritical water gasification; Hydrothermal liquefaction; Biocrude; Cattle manure; Catalyst; Kinetic modelling; Eley-Rideal (ER); Rate determining step (RDS)

资金

  1. NSERC [400495]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, we performed catalytic supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of biomass to enhance hydrogen production. First we used glucose as a model compound to screen the best catalyst and then we used this catalyst to gasify biocrude from hydrothermal liquefaction of cattle manure. We introduced a novel dual metal (Ni, Ru)-dual support (Al2O3, ZrO2) catalyst for the first time in SCWG in order to improve the H-2 yield. A continuous flow tubular reactor was employed to perform the experiments. Novel 10%Ni-0.08%Ru/Al2O3-ZrO2 catalyst showed the highest H-2 yield (1.34 mol/mol of C for glucose and 1.01 mol/mol of C for biocrude) and highest carbon gasiifcation efficiency (88% for glucose and 92% for biocrude). It was found that Ru promoted Ni and ZrO2 showed some catalytic activities towards hydrogen production. The pressure was 25 MPa for all experiments. Stability test showed that 10%Ni-0.08%Ru/Al2O3-ZrO2 was highly stable for a 20 h run. Among the parameters studied, higher temperature favored H-2 yield, whereas higher concentration led to lower H-2 yield. We found that carbon gasification efficiency of cattle manure biocrude was independent of variation in temperature and concentration. Also the equilibrium condition was attained at lower temperature and concentration in terms of carbon conversion of the feed. An Eley-Rideal (ER) based mechanistic model was devised and tested against the obtained data. It was found the dissociation of adsorbed oxygenated hydrocarbon is the rate determining step with an average absolute deviation 6.65%. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据