4.8 Article

Macrophage silica nanoparticle response is phenotypically dependent

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 53, 期 -, 页码 574-582

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.070

关键词

Macrophage; Nanoparticles; Drug delivery; Silica

资金

  1. NIH [R01ES024681]
  2. Department of Defense [W81XWH-11-1-0057]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phagocytes are important players in host exposure to nanomaterials. Macrophages in particular are believed to be among the first responders and primary cell types that uptake and process nanoparticles, mediating host biological responses by subsequent interactions with inflammatory signaling pathways and immune cells. However, variations in local microenvironmental cues can significantly change the functional and phenotype of these cells, impacting nanoparticle uptake and overall physiological response. Herein we focus on describing the response of specific RAW 264.7 macrophage phenotypes (M1, INF-gamma/LPS induced and M2, IL-4 induced) to Stober silica nanoparticle exposure in vitro and how this response might correlate with macrophage response to nanoparticles in vivo. It was observed that variations in macrophage phenotype produce significant differences in macrophage morphology, silica nanoparticle uptake and toxicity. High uptake was observed in M1, versus low uptake in M2 cells. M2 cells also displayed more susceptibility to concentration dependent proliferative effects, suggesting potential M1 involvement in in vivo uptake. Nanoparticles accumulated within liver and spleen tissues, with high association with macrophages within these tissues and an overall Th1 response in vivo. Both in vitro and in vivo studies are consistent in demonstrating that silica nanoparticles exhibit high macrophage sequestration, particularly those with Th1/M1 phenotype and in clearance organs. This sequestration and phenotypic response should be a primary consideration when designing new Stober silica nanoparticle systems, as it might affect the overall efficacy. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据