4.8 Article

Long-term toxicity of reduced graphene oxide nanosheets: Effects on female mouse reproductive ability and offspring development

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 188-200

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.03.015

关键词

Reduced graphene oxide nanosheets; Female mouse; Reproductive toxicity; Offspring health

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31370961]
  2. Nanoscience Foundation of Shanghai [13NM1402000]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-07-0618]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) nanosheets have emerged as novel materials for cancer therapeutics. Their toxicity has attracted much attention since these nanomaterials may have great potential for clinical cancer treatment. Here we report the influence of rGO exposure on female mouse reproductive ability and offspring development. Mouse dams were injected with small or large rGO nanosheets at different doses and time points, pre- or post-fertilization. The sex hormone levels of adult female mice did not significantly change compared with the control group after intravenous injection with either small or large rGO, even at a high dose (25 mg/kg). Mouse dams could produce healthy offspring after treatment with rGO nanosheets before pregnancy and at an early gestational stage (similar to 6 days). Despite the successful delivery of offspring, malformed fetuses were found among rGO-injected dam litters. All mice had abortions when injected with low (6.25 mg/kg) or intermediate (12.5 mg/kg) doses at a late gestational stage (similar to 20 days); the majority of pregnant mice died when injected with the high dose of rGO at this stage of pregnancy. Interestingly, all surviving rGO-injected mouse mothers gave birth to another litter of healthy pups. The results presented in this work are important for a deeper understanding of the toxicity of rGO nanosheets on female reproductivity and their offspring development. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据