4.7 Article

Numerical study of particle mixing in a tilted three-dimensional tumbler and a new particle-size mixing index

期刊

ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 30, 期 10, 页码 2338-2351

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2019.07.017

关键词

Discrete element method; Particle; Mixing; Tilted tumbler; Mixing flow

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [51576211]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863) [2014AA052701]
  3. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of P.R. China (FANEDD) [201438]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new mixing index is proposed, which is an improved Lacey index based on coordination number fraction. The differences and similarities among many mixing indices are compared, including the new mixing index, the information entropy based on coordination number fraction, the Lacey index based on local concentration, and the information entropy based on local concentration. The first two indices are microscopic since the coordination number fraction is on particle-scale, whereas the latter two are mesoscopic as the local concentration is mesoscopic scale. The newly proposed mixing evaluation indices does not include inauthentic temporal oscillations. Moreover, using mixing index, the mixing characteristics of particles in a tilted tumbler are studied by discrete element method (DEM). The tumbler's angle of tilt alpha = 0 degrees, 10 degrees, 20 degrees, 30 degrees, 40 degrees, 50 degrees, 60 degrees and 70 degrees, at five rotating velocities omega = 0.175, 0.35, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7 and 1.4 rad/s corresponding to Froude number F-r = 0.0025, 0.001, 0.002, 0.003, 0.004, 0.016 respectively are simulated. It is found that both increasing the tilt angle and the rotating speed have negative effects on the particle mixing within the scope of this study. (C) 2019 The Society of Powder Technology Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. and The Society of Powder Technology Japan. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据