4.8 Article

Tunable Hydrophile-Lipophile Balance for Manipulating Structural Stability and Tumor Retention of Amphiphilic Nanoparticles

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 31, 期 35, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201901586

关键词

amphiphiles; hydrophile-lipophile balance; photodynamic therapy; self-assembly; tumor penetration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51673127, 51873120, 81621003, 81801820]
  2. Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province [2018HH0006]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018SCU12032]
  4. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2015DFE52780]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrophile-lipophile balance (HLB) has a great influence on the self-assembly and physicochemical properties of amphiphiles, thus affecting their biological effects. It is shown that amphiphilic nanoparticles (NPs) with a moderate HLB value display enhanced stability and highly efficient tumor retention. 2,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)propionic acid hyperbranched poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-pyropheophorbide-a (Ppa) amphiphiles (G320P, G310P, G220P, and G210P) are synthesized with a tunable HLB value from 6.1 to 9.9 by manipulating the number of generation of dendrons (G2 or G3) and the molecular weight of PEG chains (10 or 20 kDa). Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that G320P and G210P with a moderate HLB value (8.0 and 7.8) self-assemble into very stable NPs with a small solvent accessible surface area and high nonbonding interactions. G320P with a moderate HLB value (8.0) and a long PEG chain excels against other NPs in prolonging the blood circulation time of Ppa (up to 13-fold), penetrating deeply into multicellular tumor spheroids and accumulating in tumors, and enhancing the PDT efficacy with a tumor growth inhibition of 96.0%. Rational design of NPs with a moderate HLB value may be implemented in these NP-derived nanomedicines to achieve high levels of retention in tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据