4.8 Review

Rational Design of Nanostructured Electrode Materials toward Multifunctional Supercapacitors

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201902564

关键词

cell designing; charge storage mechanism; multiple functional supercapacitors; performance evaluation; structure tailoring

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21503065, 51672065]
  2. National Research Foundation Investigatorship, National Research Foundation, Singapore [NRF-NRFI2016-05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As an intermediate step during energy usage, supercapacitors with superior power density, long-term cycling stability, and moderate energy density have attracted immense interest as a facile route to use energy in a clean, efficient, and versatile manner in smart grid applications, as well as portable devices and other applications. Currently, the major drawback of supercapacitors is the low energy density. Electrode materials are the key components determining the cell performance. Great research efforts are made to develop nanostructured electrode materials with high performance. On the other hand, integrating supercapacitors with other applications have led to the emergence of many new types of multifunctional supercapacitors, which are attractive for a myriad of applications. The current understanding on charge/discharge mechanisms of electric double layer capacitors and pseudo-capacitors is discussed along with recent development in designing nanostructured electrode materials by structure/morphology engineering, doping, and crystal structure controlling. Achievements in multifunctional supercapacitors like flexible supercapacitors, all-solid-state supercapacitors, self-healing supercapacitors, electrochromic supercapacitors, self-chargeable supercapacitors, and supercapacitors integrated with sensors are illustrated. Finally, opportunities and challenges in developing high performance and multifunctional supercapacitors are proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据