4.8 Article

All-Cellulose-Based Quasi-Solid-State Sodium-Ion Hybrid Capacitors Enabled by Structural Hierarchy

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 39, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201903895

关键词

cellulose; quasi-solid-state; sodium-ion capacitors; structural hierarchy

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/R021554/2, EP/S018204/2]
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
  4. EPSRC [EP/S018204/2, EP/R021554/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Na-ion hybrid capacitors consisting of battery-type anodes and capacitor-style cathodes are attracting increasing attention on account of the abundance of sodium-based resources as well as the potential to bridge the gap between batteries (high energy) and supercapacitors (high power). Herein, hierarchically structured carbon materials inspired by multiscale building units of cellulose from nature are assembled with cellulose-based gel electrolytes into Na-ion capacitors. Nonporous hard carbon anodes are obtained through the direct thermal pyrolysis of cellulose nanocrystals. Nitrogen-doped carbon cathodes with a coral-like hierarchically porous architecture are prepared via hydrothermal carbonization and activation of cellulose microfibrils. The reversible charge capacity of the anode is 256.9 mAh g(-1) when operating at 0.1 A g(-1) from 0 to 1.5 V versus Na+/Na, and the discharge capacitance of cathodes tested within 1.5 to 4.2 V versus Na+/Na is 212.4 F g(-1) at 0.1 A g(-1). Utilizing Na+ and ClO4- as charge carriers, the energy density of the full Na-ion capacitor with two asymmetric carbon electrodes can reach 181 Wh kg(-1) at 250 W kg(-1), which is one of the highest energy devices reported until now. Combined with macrocellulose-based gel electrolytes, all-cellulose-based quasi-solid-state devices are demonstrated possessing additional advantages in terms of overall sustainability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据