4.8 Article

Porphyrin MOF Dots-Based, Function -Adaptive Nanoplatform for Enhanced Penetration and Photodynamic Eradication of Bacterial Biofilms

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 30, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201903018

关键词

biofilms eradication; biofilms penetration; enhanced photodynamic efficacy; MOF dots

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21431007, 21533008, 21601175, 21673223, 91856205, 21871249, 21820102009]
  2. Key Program of Frontier of Sciences (CAS) [QYZDJ-SSW-SLH052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) has been considered as an attractive treatment option for biofilms ablation. However, even very efficient photosensitizers (PSs) still need high light doses and PS concentrations to eliminate biofilms due to the limited penetration and diffusion of PSs in biofilms. Moreover, the hypoxic microenvironment and rapid depletion of oxygen during PDT severely limit their therapeutic effects. Herein, for the first time, a porphyrin-based metal organic framework (pMOF) dots based nanoplatform with effective biofilm penetration, self-oxygen generation, and enhanced photodynamic efficiency is synthesized for bacterial biofilms eradication. The function-adaptive nanoplatform is composed of pMOF dots encapsulated by human serum albumin coated manganese dioxide (MnO2). The pH/H2O2-responsive decomposition of MnO2 in biofilms triggers the release of ultra small and positively charged pMOF dots and simultaneously generates O-2 in situ to alleviate hypoxia for biofilms. The released pMOF dots with high reactive oxygen species yield can effectively penetrate into biofilms, strongly bind with bacterial cell surface, and ablate bacterial biofilms. Importantly, such a nano platform can realize great therapeutic outcomes for treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infected subcutaneous abscesses in vivo without damage to healthy tissues, which offers a promising strategy for efficient biofilms eradication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据