4.8 Article

Hydrogen production by steam reforming of liquefied natural gas (LNG) over mesoporous Ni/Al2O3 catalyst prepared by an EDTA-assisted impregnation method

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 179-188

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.06.023

关键词

Hydrogen production; Steam reforming of LNG; Ni/Al2O3 catalyst; EDTA-assisted impregnation method

资金

  1. Global Frontier R&D Program on Center for Multiscale Energy System - National Research Foundation under the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Korea [20110031575]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A mesoporous alumina (denoted as MA) support was prepared by an epoxide-driven sol-gel method. A mesoporous Ni/Al2O3 catalyst was then prepared via impregnation of Ni(EDTA)(2-) complex anions onto positively-charged mesoporous alumina support (denoted as NiE/MA). For comparison, a mesoporous Ni/Al2O3 catalyst was also prepared by introducing nickel species onto MA support via conventional impregnation method (denoted as Ni/MA). Both NiE/MA and Ni/MA catalysts were applied to the hydrogen production by steam reforming of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in order to investigate the effect of preparation method on the catalytic performance. Ni/MA catalyst retained relatively large amount of nickel species in the form of bulk nickel oxide, which were weakly bound to alumina support compared to NiE/MA catalyst. It was found that the reduced NiE/MA catalyst showed smaller metallic nickel particle size and higher nickel dispersion than the reduced Ni/MA catalyst, implying that NiE/MA catalyst retained stronger resistance toward nickel sintering than Ni/MA catalyst during the reduction process. It was also revealed that methane adsorption capacity of the reduced NiE/MA catalyst was larger than that of the reduced Ni/MA catalyst. NiE/MA catalyst with larger methane adsorption capacity exhibited better catalytic performance than Ni/MA catalyst in the hydrogen production by steam reforming of LNG. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据