4.8 Article

A modular calcination method to prepare modified N-doped TiO2 nanoparticle with high photocatalytic activity

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 308-316

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.10.048

关键词

Modular calcination; N-doped TiO2; Benzene; Visible light; Superoxide anion radical

资金

  1. Graduate Student's Entrepreneurial Innovation Fund of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [2015650011]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB939705]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a highly active modified N-doped TiO2 nanoparticle is prepared by a novel modular calcination method. The combination among ammonia, hydrogen, air and vacuum module is investigated comprehensively. Moreover, the effect of calcination order on photocatalytic activity is also studied. The photocatalytic property of sample annealed in ammonia firstly is better than that of the sample annealed in ammonia last. NV-TiO2 sample which is prepared by combination between ammonia and vacuum module possesses the highest photocatalytic activity towards benzene. The photodegradation result shows that 300 ppm benzene can be decomposed completely during four hour visible light illumination. The excellent photocatalytic performance is attributed to the improvement of light harvesting, charge separation and increased surface electron scavenger, simultaneously. Besides, the photocatalytic degradation reaction path of benzene demonstrates that phenol is an important intermediate product. The faster decomposition of phenol is corresponded to higher photocatalytic reaction rate. In fact, the effect of calcination order on the photocatalytic activity is embodied in differences of the amount of oxygen vacancy and surface cleanliness. These findings aid us to prepare highly efficient visible light active photocatalyst by using a simple method and deepen the understanding on the mechanism of decomposing benzene. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据