4.8 Article

Fabrication of TiO2/RGO/Cu2O heterostructure for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 181, 期 -, 页码 7-15

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.07.032

关键词

Photoelectrochemistry; Hydrogen production; Heterostructure; Reduced graphene oxide; Cu2O

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21401082, 21201085]
  2. Natural science foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2012294, BK20141305]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014T70473]
  4. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Resource Utilizations [RERU2015004]
  5. Youth Backbone Teacher Training Engineering of Jiangsu University
  6. Chinese-German Cooperation Research Project [GZ1091]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel heterostructure built from titanium dioxide (TiO2), reduced graphene oxide (RGO) and cuprous oxide (Cu2O) has been successfully designed and prepared for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. The stepwise introduction of three materials on conductive glass substrate has been realized through hydrothermal and chemical solution deposition methods, respectively. The morphology of Cu2O regularly altered with increasing the amount of Cu2O. The photoelectrochemical performance of heterostructure was systematically investigated, and the synergistic effect of TiO2, RGO and Cu2O was conducive to improving the absorption spectrum range and electron/hole separation, which resulted in the enhancement of photocurrent intensity and incident photon-to-photocurrent efficiency. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) further confirmed that TiO2/RGO/Cu2O heterostructure possessed the lowest charge-transfer resistance, revealing that heterostructure could significantly accelerate the electron mobility compared with bare TiO2. More importantly, the hydrogen production rate of TiO2/RGO/Cu2O heterostructure was up to 631.6 mu mol/h m(2) (radiation intensity: 47 mW/cm(2)) which is almost three times than that of bare TiO2. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据