4.4 Article

Real-world 10-year experiences with intravitreal treatment with ranibizumab and aflibercept for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

期刊

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
卷 98, 期 2, 页码 132-138

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aos.14183

关键词

anti-vascular endothelial growth factor; long-term; neovascular age-related macular degeneration; real-world; retina; wet age-related macular degeneration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To report 10-year, real-world experiences with intravitreal therapy (IVT) using vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods Retrospective single-centre review of IVT-log 2007-2019 with a treatment-as-needed regimen and ETDRS visual acuity charts. Results The 4,678 treatment-naive eyes of 3,668 patients received a mean of 5.4 IVT in the first year and 4.0-4.3 IVT yearly thereafter. Baseline mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 57.9 (+/- 16.4) letters (6/18) that improved a mean +2.1 (+/- 0.2) letters at the first follow-up visit and gradually declined to -5.0 (+/- 2.2) letters after 10 years. At baseline, there were 29% with BCVA >= 6/12. This proportion increased to 31-37% until year 9. There were 8% with BCVA loss of >= 3 lines at the first follow-up visit increasing to 34% after 10 years. Poorer baseline BCVA was associated with larger increase in BCVA (p < 0.0001, multiple linear regression). The 2,566 (55%) discontinued eyes had a mean baseline BCVA of 56.9 (+/- 16.4) letters compared with 61.5 (+/- 15.9) letters for eyes remaining in treatment. In year 0-7, the discontinued eyes lost an additional mean 2-4 letters (last observation carried forward) but were similar thereafter. There were 12.6% (74 of 585 eligible eyes) that were still in treatment after 10 years. At baseline, 10% had bilateral nAMD. Of patients with unilateral presentation, 17% had received fellow-eye IVT after 5 years. Conclusion A treatment-as-needed regimen stabilized BCVA in active nAMD up to 10 years in most eyes. Baseline BCVA was the most important prognostic factor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据