4.4 Article

Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) deep brain stimulation (DBS): a promising surgical option for the treatment of refractory thalamic pain syndrome (TPS)

期刊

ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
卷 161, 期 8, 页码 1579-1588

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-019-03975-5

关键词

Thalamic pain syndrome; Dejerine-Roussy syndrome; Neuropathic pain; Deep brain stimulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundNeuroimaging evidences and previous successful case series of cingulotomy for cancer pain have disclosed the key-role of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in the generation of the empathic and affective dimension of pain. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of ACC neuromodulation for the treatment of the thalamic pain syndrome (TPS), a chronic neuropathic disease often complicated by severe affective and emotional distress in the long term.MethodFrom January 2015 to April 2017, 5 patients with pure drug-refractory TPS underwent ACC deep brain stimulation (DBS) at our institution. Quantitative assessment of pain and health-related quality of life were performed 1day before surgery and postoperatively at 6 and 18months by using the numeric rating scale (NRS), the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), and the McGill pain and the EuroQol5-domain questionnaires.ResultsMean age at surgery was 56.2years (range, 47-66). NRS score improved by 37.9% at 6months (range, -22.2 to -80%) and by 35% at 18months (range, -11.1 to -80%). At the last follow-up, one patient reported a relevant pain reduction (NRS 2), only complaining of mild pain poorly interfering with activities of daily living. Concomitant improvements in the McGill and EuroQol5-domain pain questionnaires, SF-36 total and sub-item scores were also noticed at each follow-up. No surgical or stimulation-related complications occurred during the study period.ConclusionsACC DBS may be a safe and promising surgical option to alleviate discomfort and improve the overall quality of life in a patient affected by drug-resistant TPS. Further prospective, larger, and randomized studies are needed to validate these findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据