4.8 Article

Ruthenium Nanoframes in the Face-Centered Cubic Phase: Facile Synthesis and Their Enhanced Catalytic Performance

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 7241-7251

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b02890

关键词

ruthenium nanoframes; fcc phase; galvanic replacement; thermal stability; catalysis

资金

  1. NSF [DMR 1505400, ECCS-1542174, DGE-1650044]
  2. Georgia Institute of Technology
  3. ORNL's Center for Nano phase Materials Sciences, U.S. DOE Office of Science User Facility
  4. Georgia Tech-ORNL Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Owing to their highly open structure and a large number of low-coordination sites on the surface, noble-metal nanoframes are intriguing for catalytic applications. Here, we demonstrate the rational synthesis of Ru cuboctahedral nanoframes with enhanced catalytic performance toward hydrazine decomposition. The synthesis starts from Pd nanocubes, which quickly undergo truncation at the corners as a consequence of oxidative etching caused by Br- ions. Afterward, the galvanic replacement reaction between Pd and Ru(III) ions dominates, leading to the selective deposition of Ru atoms on the corners and edges and thereby the fabrication of Pd@Ru core-frame cuboctahedra. Significantly, the deposited Ru atoms are crystallized in a face-centered cubic (fcc) phase instead of the hexagonal close-packed (hcp) structure typical of bulk Ru. Upon the removal of Pd remaining in the core via chemical etching, we obtain Ru cuboctahedral nanoframes. By varying the amount of the Ru(III) precursor, the ridge thickness of the nanoframes can be tuned from a few atomic layers up to 10. Both the frame structure and fcc crystal phase of the Ru cuboctahedral nanoframes can be well preserved up to 300 degrees C. When compared with hcp-Ru nanoparticles, the fcc-Ru nanoframes displayed substantial enhancement in terms of H-2 selectivity toward hydrazine decomposition. This work offers the opportunity to engineer both the morphology and crystal phase of Ru nanocrystals for catalytic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据