4.8 Article

Ultrafast All-Optical Modulation in 2D Hybrid Perovskites

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 9504-9510

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b04483

关键词

2D Ruddlesden-Popper perovskites; pump-probe spectroscopy; optical Kerr effect; two-photon absorption; optical switching

资金

  1. EPSRC Reactive Plasmonics Programme [EP/M013812/1]
  2. EPSRC Mathematical Fundamentals of Metamaterials Programme [EP/L024926/1]
  3. Lee Lucas Chair in Physics
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC 2089/1 - 390776260]
  5. Marie SklodowskaCurie Fellowship
  6. Dstl
  7. National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Midsized Centre program (CA2DM), Singapore
  8. EPSRC [EP/L024926/1, EP/M013812/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional (2D) hybrid organic inorganic Ruddlesden-Popper perovskites (RPPs) have been recently shown to exhibit large nonlinear optical properties due to the strong excitonic effects present in their multiple quantum wells. In this work, we use nondegenerate pump probe spectroscopy in the 600-1000 nm wavelength range to study the influence of nonlinear effects on the ultrafast dynamics of 2D RPP thin flakes. We find that, under sub-bandgap excitation, 100 nm thick perovskite sheets allow up to similar to 2% reflectivity modulation within a 20 fs period, due to the nonlinear optical Kerr effect and two-photon absorption, surpassing by a factor of similar to 5 the reported nonlinear performance of photonic metasurfaces and single nanoantennas. When the excitation is resonant with the excitonic absorption, the ultrafast nature of the nonlinear response is lost due to the presence of linear absorption creating longlived free carriers. Our results suggest that 2D RPPs are potential nanoscale all-optical modulators in the visible/near-infrared waveband for applications such as ultrafast information processing, optical data transmission, and high-performance computing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据