4.8 Article

Plasmon-Free Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Using Metallic 2D Materials

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 8312-8319

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b03761

关键词

chemical vapor deposition; niobium disulfide; surface enhanced Raman scattering; metallic 2D materials; charge transfer

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51472164]
  2. Shenzhen Peacock Plan [KQTD2016053112042971]
  3. Educational Commission of Guangdong Province [2015KGJHZ006]
  4. Simons Foundation [377485]
  5. John Templeton Foundation [58851]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two dimensional (2D) materials-based plasmon-free surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) is an emerging field in nondestructive analysis. However, impeded by the low density of state (DOS), an inferior detection sensitivity is frequently encountered due to the low enhancement factor of most 2D materials. Metallic transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) could be ideal plasmon-free SERS substrates because of their abundant DOS near the Fermi level. However, the absence of controllable synthesis of metallic 2D TMDs has hindered their study as SERS substrates. Here, we realize controllable synthesis of ultrathin metallic 2D niobium disulfide (NbS2) (<2.5 nm) with large domain size (>160 mu m). We have explored the SERS performance of as-obtained NbS2, which shows a detection limit down to 10(-14) mol.L-1. The enhancement mechanism was studied in depth by density functional theory, which suggested a strong correlation between the SERS performance and DOS near the Fermi level. NbS2 features the most abundant DOS and strongest binding energy with probe molecules as compared with other 2D materials such as graphene, 1T-phase MoS2, and 2H-phase MoS2. The large DOS increases the intermolecular charge transfer probability and thus induces prominent Raman enhancement. To extend the results to practical applications, the resulting NbS2-based plasmon-free SERS substrates were applied for distinguishing different types of red wines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据