4.8 Article

Blocking Polysulfide with Co2B@CNT via Synergetic Adsorptive Effect toward Ultrahigh-Rate Capability and Robust Lithium-Sulfur Battery

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 6742-6750

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b01329

关键词

Co2B@CNT; separator; synergistic effect; catalytic activity; cycling stability

资金

  1. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology [2019DX13]
  2. Key Laboratory of Functional Inorganic Material Chemistry (Heilongjiang University), Ministry of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Li-S batteries have attracted great interest as the next-generation secondary batteries due to their high energy density, being environmentally friendly, and low price. However, the road to commercialization of lithium sulfur batteries remains limited owing to the shuttle effect of soluble polysulfides, which results in the inferior cycle stability. Herein, a potent functional separator is developed to restrain the shuttle effect by coating Co2B@carbon nanotube layer on the commercialized polypropylene separator. In merits of the coadsorption of Co sites and B sites, such Co2B shows highly efficient polysulfides block (11.67 mg/m(2) for Li2S6). Besides, the composite also exhibits obviously catalysis from Li2S8 to Li2S. By combining the fast electron transportation along the carbon the modified separator and common carbon-sulfur cathode. Typically, the cell with Co2B@CNT shows prominent cycling life with a capacity degradation of 0.0072% per cycle (3000 cycles) and ultrahigh-rate capability at 5 C current (1172.8 mAh/g), which outstands the previously reported polysulfides barrier layer. The cell with Co2B@CNT can exhibit electrochemical performance at areal capacity of 5.5 mAh/cm(2) (0.5 C) when the sulfur loading increased to 5.8 mg/cm(2). This work defines an efficacious strategy to restrain the shuttle effect of polysulfides and shed light on the great potential of borides in Li-S battery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据