4.8 Article

Rational Synthesis and Gas Sensing Performance of Ordered Mesoporous Semiconducting WO3/NiO Composites

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 29, 页码 26268-26276

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b08128

关键词

gas sensors; mesoporous materials; tungsten oxide; nickel oxide; doping; sensing mechanism

资金

  1. NSF of China [21673048, 21875044, 51402049]
  2. Key Basic Research Program of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [17JC1400100]
  3. Youth Top-notch Talent Support Program of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Semiconducting metal oxides have attracted increasing attention in various fields due to their intrinsic properties. In this study, a facile solvent evaporation-induced multicomponent co-assembly approach coupled with a carbon-supported crystallization strategy is employed to controllably synthesize crystalline mesoporous nickel oxide-doped tungsten oxides in an acidic THE/H2O solution with poly(ethylene oxide)-b-polystyrene diblock copolymers (PEO-b-PS) as the structure-directing agent, tungsten(VI) chlorides as W03 precursors, and Ni(AcAc)(2) as the NiO precursor. The obtained materials possess a face-centered cubic mesoporous structure, large pore size (similar to 30 nm), high surface area (30-50 m(2), g(-1)) large pore volume (0.15-0.19 cm(3) CI), and ultralarge pore windows (12-16 nm) connecting adjacent mesopores, and the mesoporous WO3 framework was decorated by ultrafine NiO nanocrystals. Due to their well-connected porous structure and high surface areas with rich WO3-NiO interfaces, the composite materials exhibit superior gas sensing performance with an ultrafast response (similar to 4s), high sensitivity (R-a/R-g = 58 +/- 5.1), and selectivity to 50 ppm H2S at a relatively low working temperature (250 degrees C). The chemical mechanism study reveals complicated surface reactions of WO3/NiO-based gas sensors, and SO2, WS2, and NiS intermediates were found to be generated during the gas sensing process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据