4.8 Article

Interfacial Engineering for High-Efficiency Nanorod Array-Structured Perovskite Solar Cells

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 37, 页码 33770-33780

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b07610

关键词

TiO2 nanorod; perovskite solar cells; atomic layer deposition; compact layer; depletion region

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1505243]
  2. Fujian Province of China [2016H0036, JZ160404, 2015J01064]
  3. Qinghai Province of China [2017-ZJ-750]
  4. Fluid Interface Reactions, Structures and Transport (FIRST) Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center - US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TiO2 nanorod (NR) array for perovskite solar cells (PSCs) has attained great importance due to its superb power conversion efficiency (PCE) compared to that of the traditional mesoporous TiO2 film. A TiO2 compact layer for the growth of TiO2 NR array via spin-coating cannot meet the requirements for efficient NR-based PSCs. Herein, we have developed and demonstrated the insertion of a bifunctional extrathinTiO(2) interlayer (5 nm) by atomic layer deposition (ALD) at the interface of the fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO)/TiO2 compact layer to achieve alleviated electron exchange and a reduced energetic barrier. Thus, an accelerated extraction of electrons fromTiO(2) NR arrays via the compact layer and their transfer to the FTO substrate can improve the PSC efficiency. The thickness of the spin-coatedTiO(2) compact layer on the ALD-deposited TiO2 layer is spontaneously optimized. Finally, an outstanding efficiency of 20.28% has been achieved from a champion PSC with negligible hysteresis and high reliability. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the superiority of TiO2 -NR-based PSCs withstanding the dry heat and thermal cycling tests. The results are of great importance for the preparation of efficient and durable PSCs for real-world applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据