4.6 Article

Understanding Professional Identity Formation in Early Clerkship: A Novel Framework

期刊

ACADEMIC MEDICINE
卷 94, 期 10, 页码 1574-1580

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002835

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of British Columbia [20S50517]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Medical educators should foster students' professional attitudes because individuals are more likely to act in accordance with medicine's professional values if these values have been internalized. Still, there is much to be learned about how students examine and negotiate their emerging identities. This study examined third-year medical students' experiences of professional identity formation (PIF) during clinical clerkship. Method The authors relied on an interpretivist perspective, informed by a grounded theory approach, to analyze data, which were collected from a pilot course designed to support medical students' efforts to unhide the hidden curriculum in relation to their development as medical students and emerging professionals. Results Twelve third-year medical students engaged in 10 collaborative discussions with 3 faculty members, a resident, and a fourth-year student (2015-2016). Discussions facilitated students' reflection on their professional journeys. Analysis of transcribed discussions resulted in a conceptual framework useful for exploring and understanding students' reflections on their PIF. Through analyzing students' experiences, the authors identified 4 components that constituted PIF stories: context, focus, catalyst, process. Conclusions The analysis resulted in the development of a conceptual framework and distinct identity formation themes. Discrete reflections focused on either students' current identity (being) or their sense of future self (becoming). The study identified catalysts that sparked participants' introspection about, or their processing of, identity. The moments that generate profound feelings of awareness in students are often moments that would not be recognizable (even post hoc) as remarkable by others.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据