4.4 Article

3D-Printed Wearable Personalized Orthodontic Retainers for Sustained Release of Clonidine Hydrochloride

期刊

AAPS PHARMSCITECH
卷 20, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1208/s12249-019-1460-6

关键词

3D printing; clonidine hydrochloride; orthodontic retainer; wearable device; sustained release

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Orthodontic retainers are wearable customizable medical devices for dental protection or alignment. Here, clonidine hydrochloride (CH)-loaded wearable personalized 3D printed orthodontic retainers were studied for local sustained-release of drugs. CH powders were mixed with PEG 4000, Tween 80, poly(lactic acid), and polycaprolactone.The mixturewas hot-melt extruded to form a filament that was 3D printed to a customizable original orthodontic retainer with the fused deposition modeling (FDM) method. The original retainer showed aburst release of CH in the early stage of thedissolutionprocess though asustained release appearedin the late stage. Thein vivo burst release of CH would lead to unexpected side effect. The original retainer was modified by coating with hydrophilicpolymers or washing with buffered solutions to obtain the coated or washed retainer. The coated retainer still showed a burst releasewhile the washed retainer showed an optimalsustained release. ManyCH microparticles existed on the surface of original retainers according to the scanning electron microscopic image so that the burst releasewas unavoidable. The hydrophilic polymer coating method did not change the releaseprofile because the polymer was also rapidly dissolved. However, most ofthe surface CH can be eliminated by washing so that the burst release dissappearedin the washed retainer. Furthermore, the simulated CH concentration-time profiles in the circulation of humans of thewashed retainer showed the stable and appropriate drug levels for more than 3days. Wearable personalized 3D printed drug-loaded orthodontic retainers are a promising drug-device for sustained release of drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据