4.5 Article

Selective synthesis of 2-furoic acid and 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furancarboxylic acid from bio-based furans by recombinant Escherichia coli cells

期刊

MOLECULAR CATALYSIS
卷 469, 期 -, 页码 68-74

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcat.2019.03.006

关键词

Aldehyde dehydrogenases; Biocatalysis; Furans; Platform chemicals; Selective oxidation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21676103]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2017A030313056]
  3. Science and Technology Project of Guangzhou City [201804010179]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Upgradation of bio-based furans into chemicals and biofuels has received great interest recently. In this work, we reported selective synthesis of furan carboxylic acids from the corresponding aldehydes by recombinant Escherichia coli cells expressing 3-succinoylsemialdehyde-pyridine dehydrogenase (SAPDH) from Comamonas testosteroni SC1588. The effects of induction and reaction conditions on whole-cell catalytic oxidation of furfural (FF) were studied. High temperature induction resulted in decreased activities of recombinant cells, likely due to improper protein folding. Nonetheless, recombinant cells induced under high temperature enable the byproduct furfuryl alcohol to be faster re-oxidized into 2-furoic acid (FCA) than those induced under low temperature. So the yield and selectivity of FCA were improved significantly by using high temperature induction, at expense of slightly longer reaction periods. The activities of recombinant cells highly depended on pH. The tolerant levels of this recombinant strain toward FF and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) were approximately 100 mM. FCA and 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furancarboxylic acid (HMFCA) were obtained with the yields of 95-98%. FCA of up to 147 mM was produced by a fed-batch strategy, in a quantitative yield. In addition, most aromatic aldehydes tested were transformed into the target carboxylic acids by this biocatalytic method, with the yields up to 100%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据