4.5 Article

Template-free synthesis of carbon self-doped ZnO superstructures as efficient support for ultra fine Pd nanoparticles and their catalytic activity towards benzene oxidation

期刊

MOLECULAR CATALYSIS
卷 469, 期 -, 页码 118-130

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcat.2019.03.013

关键词

Zinc oxide superstructures; Oxygen mobility; Benzene oxidation; Heterogeneous catalysis; C-doping

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21536010, 41673088]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work reports the template-free synthesis of diverse Carbon, self-doped Zinc oxide (C-doped ZnOSPs) superstructures through synergy between Cinnamomum camphora leaf extract and NaOH assisted by freeze-drying and annealing at desired temperatures. The high-activity and cost-effective porous supports with improved reducibility and charge transport act as catalyst support for ultra fine Pd NPs in the gas-phase selective remediation of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) benzene. Uv-vis spectroscopy, XRD, XPS, SEM and TEM and photoluminescence studies, were used to characterize and verify the nature of the ZnOSPs. XPS analyses reveal that C-doping is introduced into the lattice of the as-produced ZnOSPs and the extent varied with leaf extract amount used. FTIR-analysis and simulation experiments showed flavones, polyphenols, and proteins were responsible for the formation of the ZnOSPs. Moreover, ultrafine Pd NPs sizes 1(-)3 nm can be anchored on the exterior surfaces of ZnOSPs to form diverse surface contact boundaries for enhanced low-temperature benzene oxidation. Pd/ZnOSP-3 catalyst with the least crystallite size 17.4 nm and largest surface contact boundary 3.2 nm presented the best performance. The superior activity of Pd/ZnOSPs over commercial Pd/ZnO-C is attributed to its carbon modification, the high porous framework; defects incorporation which causes smaller optical energy gap, improved reducibility, enhanced mechanical responses and high charge transport to promote the benzene oxidation reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据