4.3 Editorial Material

Keyhole Retrosigmoid Craniotomy for Resection of Pontine Juvenile Pilocytic Astrocytoma: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

期刊

OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 E16-E16

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ons/opz069

关键词

Juvenile pilocytic astrocytoma; Pontine; Exophytic; Surgery; Brainstem

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resection of intrinsic brainstem tumors is fraught with a high risk of morbidity. In select cases, however, complete tumor resection is possible and can result in longterm benefit to the patient. Informed consent for the operation was obtained. In this video, we illustrate the use of a keyhole retrosigmoid craniotomy for microsurgical resection of an exophytic juvenile pilocytic astrocytoma and highlight the nuances of opening the various fissures between the brainstem and the cerebellum to obtain a more direct view of the brainstem, mapping of the brainstem surface to avoid cranial nerve nuclei, use of safe entry zones to minimize injury to critical structures, and microsurgical technique used to operate within the substance of the brainstem. In general, navigation is used to optimize placement of craniotomy and size of bony opening, to delineate the superior to inferior extent of the tumor, and to confirm that the boundary between the tumor and the normal brainstem is reached at the depth. In general, the authors attempt surgical resection of brainstem tumors that are exophytic, have clear boundaries (signal on T1 postcontrast and T2 sequences denote similar tumor boundaries), do not encapsulate the basilar artery, and do not exhibit infiltration of the deep pontine fibers (as is the case with diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas). In properly selected patients, surgery for brainstem tumor can result in good resection with preservation of neurological function. This patient developed subtle weakness of the face after surgery, which did not improve at 3 mo, but had preserved hearing function and no further neurological deficits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据