4.6 Article

Photochemistry of hematite photoanodes under zero applied bias

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
卷 521, 期 -, 页码 168-173

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2015.11.041

关键词

Photocatalysis; Water splitting; Surface photovoltage spectroscopy; Hole trap; Built-in voltage

资金

  1. Research Corporation for Science Advancement (Scialog award)
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1152250, 1464938]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1464938] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Chemistry [1464938] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Chemistry
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1152250] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surface photovoltage spectroscopy (SPS) was used to observe photochemical charge separation and oxidation reactions on Fe2O3 nanorod arrays under zero applied bias. Nanorod films were grown from FeCl3 under hydrothermal conditions followed by calcination at 550 degrees C. A negative photovoltage of up - 130 mV is observed under 2.0-4.5 eV (0.1 mW cm(-2)) illumination, confirming 2.0 eV as the effective bandgap of the material, and electrons as majority carriers. SPS in the presence of air, nitrogen, water, oxygen, and under vacuum suggest that the photovoltage is associated with the oxidation of surface water and with reversible surface hole trapping on the 1 min time scale and de-trapping on the 1 h time scale. O-2 promotes water oxidation by increasing the concentration of surface holes. Sacrificial donors KI, H-2 O-2 or potassium hydroxide increase the voltage to -240 and -400 mV, due to improved hole transfer. Cobalt oxide and Co-Pi cocatalysts quench the voltage, which is tentatively attributed to the removal of surface states and enhanced e/h recombination. An energy diagram is used to relate the experimental photovoltage to the built-in potentials at the respective interfaces. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据