4.6 Article

A new set of scaling relationships for DEM-CFD simulations of fluid-solid coupling problems in saturated and cohesiveless granular soils

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL PARTICLE MECHANICS
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 657-669

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40571-019-00246-z

关键词

Scaling relationships; Similarity criteria; DEM-CFD simulation; Fluid-solid coupling analysis; Granular soils

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51709159, 51879148, 51609129]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2017T100492, 2017M612273]
  3. Special Foundation of Postdoctoral Innovation Project of Shandong Province [201702014]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Mining Disaster Prevention and Control Co-founded by Shandong Province and the Ministry of Science and Technology [MDPC201802]
  5. CRSRI Open Research Program [CKWV2018468/KY]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The discrete element method (DEM) cannot effectively account for macroscale problems because of its high computational cost and time-consuming nature, especially for fluid-solid coupling problems. Therefore, a spatially scaled-down model, which should be established based on a set of scaling laws, is commonly employed to study the behaviors of the macroscale prototype. In the present study, various basic scaling relationships proposed by previous researchers for a scaled-down model are summarized first, as well as their limitations when they are used for DEM-CFD simulation of fluid-solid coupling problems in saturated and cohesiveless granular soils. Then, a new set of scaling relationships is proposed using a governing equation approach. Finally, a DEM-CFD model is established as an example analysis to study the feasibility and accuracy of the new scaling relationship present in this study for simulating fluid-solid coupling problems in saturated and cohesiveless granular soils. The results are analyzed in comparison with other scaling relationships, and the results indicate that the new set of scaling relationships is more reasonable and accurate than others.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据