4.4 Article

Telomerase insufficiency induced telomere erosion accumulation in successive generations in dyskeratosis congenita family

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.709

关键词

compound heterozygous mutations; dyskeratosis congenita; telomerase; telomere length; TERT gene

资金

  1. Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya [KYXM-201605]
  2. science and technology major project of the ministry of science and technology of Hunan Province [2017SK1032]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31401248]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Dyskeratosis congenita (DC) is a rare heritable bone marrow failure syndrome that is associated with telomere dysfunction, and has high genetic heterogeneity and varied features. Objective This study aimed to identify the underlying genetic etiology of a DC family with more severe symptoms in the younger generation and to explore the relationship between the genetic causes and the severity of DC phenotype. Methods Whole-exome sequencing was performed on the proband to screen the candidate causative gene. The protein structure was then predicted by SWISS-MODEL software. Telomere length (TL) assay was performed on family members along with large-scale population controls. The prenatal diagnosis (PND) was performed on the fetus of parents with secondary pregnancy. Results Novel heterozygous mutations in TERT (NM_198253.2), c.1796G>A (p.Arg599Gln), c.2839T>C (p.Ser947Pro), and c.3346G>C (p.Glu1116Gln) were identified in the proband. His TL was below the first percentile of the peers, which also appeared on the fetus with epidermal dyskeratosis through PND. The TL data of large-scale population and members of the DC family implied the accumulation of telomere erosion in successive generations in this family. Conclusions Our study identified three clinical pathologic TERT mutations and implied that telomere erosion might be accumulated through successive generations, contributing to the severity of DC in the younger generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据