4.6 Review

Alternative Environmentally Friendly Insulating Gases for SF6

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr7040216

关键词

SF6; environmentally friendly insulating gas; perfluorocarbon; trifluoroiodomethane; perfluorinated ketone; fluoronitrile

资金

  1. project 'Study on Physical, Chemical and Insulation Properties, and Engineering Demostration of Environmental Insulating gas (I)-Project 3-Applied Feasibility Study of New Insulating Gas in Guangzhou Power Grid' [GZJKJXM20170330]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) shows excellent insulation performance as an insulating gas. It is suitable for various climate conditions due to its low boiling point (-64 degrees C). Therefore, it has been widely used in power grid equipment. However, its global warming potential (GWP) is 23,500 times higher than that of CO2. Thus, it is imperative to find an environmentally friendly insulating gas with excellent insulation performance, lower GWP, and which is harmless to equipment and workers to replace SF6. In this review, four possible alternatives, including perfluorocarbons, trifluoroiodomethane, perfluorinated ketones, and fluoronitrile are reviewed in terms of basic physicochemical properties, insulation properties, decomposition properties, and compatibility with metals. The influences of trace H2O or O-2 on their insulation performances are also discussed. The insulation strengths of these insulating gases were comparable to or higher than that of SF6. The GWPs of these insulating gases were lower than that of SF6. Due to their relatively high boiling point, they should be used as a mixture with buffering gases with low boiling points. Based on these four characteristics, perfluorinated ketones (C5F10O and C6F12O) and fluoronitrile (C4F7N) could partially substitute SF6 in some electrical equipment. Finally, some future needs and perspectives of environmentally friendly insulating gases are addressed for further studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据