4.6 Article

Single-Fraction Stereotactic vs Conventional Multifraction Radiotherapy for Pain Relief in Patients With Predominantly Nonspine Bone Metastases: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial

期刊

JAMA ONCOLOGY
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 872-878

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0192

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [CA016672]
  2. National Institutes of Health [CA016672]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ImportanceConsensus is lacking as to the optimal radiotherapy dose and fractionation schedule for treating bone metastases. ObjectiveTo assess the relative efficacy of high-dose, single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) vs standard multifraction radiotherapy (MFRT) for alleviation of pain in patients with mostly nonspine bone metastases. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis prospective, randomized, single-institution phase 2 noninferiority trial conducted at a tertiary cancer care center enrolled 160 patients with radiologically confirmed painful bone metastases from September 19, 2014, through June 19, 2018. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either single-fraction SBRT (12 Gy for >= 4-cm lesions or 16 Gy for <4-cm lesions) or MFRT to 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was pain response, defined by international consensus criteria as a combination of pain score and analgesic use (daily morphine-equivalent dose). Pain failure (ie, lack of response) was defined as worsening pain score (>= 2 points on a 0-to-10 scale), an increase in morphine-equivalent opioid dose of 50% or more, reirradiation, or pathologic fracture. We hypothesized that SBRT was noninferior to MFRT. ResultsIn this phase 2 noninferiority trial of 96 men and 64 women (mean [SD] age, 62.4 [10.4] years), 81 patients received SBRT and 79 received MFRT. Among evaluable patients who received treatment per protocol, the single-fraction group had more pain responders than the MFRT group (complete response+partial response) at 2 weeks (34 of 55 [62%] vs 19 of 52 [36%]) (P=.01), 3 months (31 of 43 [72%] vs 17 of 35 [49%]) (P=.03), and 9 months (17 of 22 [77%] vs 12 of 26 [46%]) (P=.03). No differences were found in treatment-related toxic effects or quality-of-life scores after SBRT vs MFRT; local control rates at 1 and 2 years were higher in patients receiving single-fraction SBRT. Conclusions and RelevanceDelivering high-dose, single-fraction SBRT seems to be an effective treatment option for patients with painful bone metastases. Among evaluable patients, SBRT had higher rates of pain response (complete response+partial response) than did MFRT and thus should be considered for patients expected to have relatively long survival. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02163226

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据