4.5 Article

A bacterial effector deubiquitinase specifically hydrolyses linear ubiquitin chains to inhibit host inflammatory signalling

期刊

NATURE MICROBIOLOGY
卷 4, 期 8, 页码 1282-1293

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41564-019-0454-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. MOST [2017YFA0503900]
  2. NSFC [81530068, 81501717]
  3. National High-level Talents Special Support Plan
  4. leading scientist program of Zhejiang High-level Talents Special Support Plan
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Linear ubiquitin (Ub) chains regulate many cellular processes, including NF-kappa B immune signalling. Pathogenic bacteria have evolved to secrete effector proteins that harbour deubiquitinase activity into host cells to disrupt host ubiquitination signalling. All previously identified effector deubiquitinases hydrolyse isopeptide-linked polyubiquitin (polyUb). It has been a long-standing question whether bacterial pathogens have evolved an effector deubiquitinase to directly cleave linear Ub chains. In this study, we performed extensive screening of bacterial pathogens and found that Legionella pneumophila-the causative agent of human Legionnaire's disease-encodes an effector protein, RavD, which harbours deubiquitinase activity exquisitely specific for linear Ub chains. RavD hydrolyses linear Ub chains but not any type of isopeptide-linked polyUb. The crystal structure of RavD with linear diubiquitin reveals that RavD adopts a papain-like fold with a Cys-His-Ser catalytic triad. The Ub-binding surface and specific interacting residues in RavD determine its specificity for Met1 linkages. RavD prevents the accumulation of linear Ub chains on Legionella-containing vacuoles established by the pathogen in host cells to inhibit the NF-kappa B pathway during infection. This study identified a unique linear Ub chain-specific effector deubiquitinase and indicates its potential application as a tool to dissect linear polyUb-mediated signalling in mammalian cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据