4.6 Article

An Exonuclease I-Assisted Silver-Metallized Electrochemical Aptasensor for Ochratoxin A Detection

期刊

ACS SENSORS
卷 4, 期 6, 页码 1560-1568

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.9b00237

关键词

Ochratoxin A; electrochemical detection; square wave voltammetry; DNA metallization; Exonuclease I; central composite design

资金

  1. Swiss Government Excellence Scholarship
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [PZ00P2_168005]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P2_168005] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ochratoxin A (OTA)-a mycotoxin produced by Aspergillus and Penicillium fungi-is a carcinogen and common trace contaminant in agricultural and processed food products. As consumption is detrimental to human and animal health, regular product monitoring is vital, and highly sensitive and portable OTA sensors are necessary in many circumstances. Herein, we report an ultrasensitive, electroanalytical aptasensor for precise determination of OTA at trace levels. The sensor leverages a DNA aptamer to capture OTA and silver metallization as a signal enhancer. Exonuclease I is used to digest unbound aptamers, engendering excellent background signal suppression and sensitivity enhancements. Efficient optimization of assay conditions is achieved using central composite design (CCD), allowing rapid evaluation of both the electrode and square wave voltammetry parameter space. The sensor exhibits excellent analytical performance, with a concentration limit of detection of 0.7 pg mL(-1), a limit of quantitation of 2.48 pg mL(-1), and a linear dynamic range (R-2 = 0.968) of over 6 orders of magnitude (between 1 pg mL(-1) and 0.1 mu g mL(-1)). Direct comparison with ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) indicates excellent analytical performance for standard solutions (R-2 = 0.995) and spiked beer samples (R-2 = 0.993), with almost quantitative recovery and less than 5% relative standard deviation (RSD).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据