4.4 Article

Design, fabrication, and evaluation of a passive deployment mechanism for deployable space telescope

期刊

ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1687814019852258

关键词

Deployment mechanism; deployable optical structure; deployable space telescope; joint clearance; alignment error; passive deployment

资金

  1. Global Surveillance Research Center (GSRC) program - Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA)
  2. Agency for Defense Development (ADD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a high precise deployment mechanism for a deployable space telescope to facilitate satellite miniaturization. It is designed with a passive deployment mechanism utilizing a spring hinge. In particular, the customized modules and an assembly jig are specifically designed to reduce alignment errors. To confirm the feasibility of the designed mechanism, three alignment errors that influence the optical performance of the structure-tilt, de-center, and despace-are theoretically analyzed for quarter, half, and full model, respectively. In the case of quarter model, significant results are obtained as a tilt of 21.12 mu rad, a de-center of 2.20 mu m, and a de-space of 1.71 mu m. Based on the theoretical analysis, a deployment mechanism of the quarter model is fabricated, and the alignments of the deployment mechanism are experimentally investigated with a measurement platform consisting of five non-contact-based laser displacement sensors. In addition, the influence of gravity on the alignment error is analyzed and compensated by investigating the tendency of the alignment error according to the rotation degree of the measurement model for the direction of gravity. As a result of the gravity compensation, the proposed mechanism gives acceptable alignment errors as a tilt of 30.04 mu rad, de-center of 8.92 mu m, and de-space of 4.03 mu m, which are controllable by employing the conventional focusing mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据