4.7 Article

Experimental study of local thermal comfort and ventilation performance for mixing, displacement and stratum ventilation in an office

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101630

关键词

Local thermal comfort; Ventilation performance; Pollutant source location; Inhaled air quality; Air distribution method

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing [cstc2018jcyjAX0663]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018CDXYCH0013, 2018CDJDCH0015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Satisfactory thermal comfort and efficient removals of airborne contaminants are crucial to the work efficiency and health of occupants. Different air distributions can generate distinct airflow patterns, thus affecting thermal comfort and ventilation performance. The experiments were conducted to study the performances of three air distribution methods (i.e. mixing ventilation (MV), displacement ventilation (DV) and stratum ventilation (SV)). Local thermal comfort was evaluated for the three air distribution methods with their individual thermally neutral temperatures. Three gaseous point pollutant sources located at the desktop, floor and manikin armpit respectively were applied to study the impact of the pollutant source locations on their ventilation performances. The distributions of air velocity, air temperature and contaminant concentration were measured. Results showed that a vertical air temperature difference of above 3 degrees C between the head and ankle levels appeared with DV, but the draught ratings (DR) under SV were higher than those under both MV and DV. Pollutant source locations exerted different effects on contaminant dispersion and contaminant removal effectiveness (CRE) for the three air distribution methods. SV always removed the contaminants effectively with all the three pollutant source locations to maintain good inhaled air quality, which was superior to MV and DV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据