4.7 Article

An applied framework to evaluate the impact of indoor office environmental factors on occupants' comfort and working conditions

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101447

关键词

Indoor environmental conditions; Comfort; Productivity; Happiness; Demographics; United Arab Emirates (UAE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an integrated data collection and analysis framework to comprehensively evaluate the impact of office indoor building environment on occupants' comfort, satisfaction, and work performance. The latter includes the perceived productivity level of respondents as well as an objective measure of basic cognitive thinking skills. The framework consists of five main stages, which include: 1) development of a survey for the subjective evaluation of comfort levels of occupants with various indoor environmental metrics, 2) development of a performance test for an objective evaluation of productivity, 3) assembly and calibration of an indoor environmental monitoring station, 4) data collection using the tools developed in the first three stages, and 5) data analysis using descriptive statistics, Spearman's rank correlations, and ordinal logistic regression models. The framework is applied and validated through a case study of a green university campus in Abu Dhabi, UAE, where data was collected from 156 building users. Results show that both environmental conditions and occupants' personal characteristics have significant impacts on how occupants perceive their indoor environment, affecting their overall satisfaction, reported happiness, reported productivity levels, and basic cognitive abilities. In parallel, demographical factors such as gender and age are significant determinants of most of the studied comfort and performance metrics, confirming the need to further account for the personal characteristics of occupants when assessing the performance of the built environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据