4.4 Article

Characterization of Four New Distinct ω-Transaminases from Pseudomonas putida NBRC 14164 for Kinetic Resolution of Racemic Amines and Amino Alcohols

期刊

APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 181, 期 3, 页码 972-985

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-016-2263-9

关键词

Transaminase; Kinetic resolution; Enantioselectivity; Chiral amino alcohol; Pseudomonas putida

资金

  1. Qualified Personnel Foundation of Taiyuan University of Technology [tyut-rc201484a]
  2. Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi (STIP) [2015132]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four uncharacterized omega-transaminases (omega TAs) from Pseudomonas putida NBRC 14164 have been identified and cloned from the pool of fully sequenced genomes. The genes were functionally expressed in Escherichia coli BL21, and the enzymes were purified and characterized. Four TAs showed highly (S)-selective omega TA activity and converted (S)-alpha-methylbenzylamine and pyruvate to acetophenone and l-Ala. The maximum activity of cloned enzymes was in the pH range of 8.0-8.5 (Pp36420), 8.5-9.5 (Pp21050), 9.0-9.5 (PpspuC), and 9.5-10.5 (PpbauA), and the optimal temperatures were at 35 A degrees C (Pp36420, Pp21050, and PpspuC) and 50 A degrees C (PpbauA), respectively, with K (M) of 161.3 mM (Pp21050), 136.7 mM (PpbauA), 398.5 mM (Pp36420), and 130.9 mM (PpspuC) and yielding a catalytic efficiency k (cat)/K (M) of 0.015, 0.003, 0.012, and 0.023 mM(-1) s(-1). Several racemic amines and amino alcohols were resolved by the cloned omega TAs; perfect conversions (48-50 %) were obtained by at least one enzyme, and the residual substrates were left with 97-99 % ee. Kinetic resolution of racemic phenylglycinol was done with PpspuC in a 100-mL scale. Enaniomeric excess of (S)-phenylglycinol reached 99 % with 45 % isolated yield. The high enantioselectivity and large substrate spectra of the cloned PpTAs showed an attractive potency for biotechnology application in production of chiral amines and amino alcohols.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据