4.7 Article

Effect of Dilatancy on the Transition From Aseismic to Seismic Slip Due to Fluid Injection in a Fault

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
卷 124, 期 4, 页码 3724-3743

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018JB016636

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss Federal Office of Energy (Stim-Design project) [SI/501354-01]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [160577]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aseismic crack growth upon activation of fault slip due to fluid injection may or may not lead to the nucleation of a dynamic rupture depending on in situ conditions, frictional properties of the fault, and the value of overpressure. In particular, a fault is coined as unstable if its residual frictional strength (r) is lower than the in situ background shear stress (o). We study here how fault dilatancy associated with slip affect shear crack propagation due to fluid injection. We use a planar bidimensional model with frictional weakening and assume that fluid flow only takes place along the fault (impermeable rock/immature fault). Dilatancy induces an undrained pore-pressure drop locally strengthening the fault. We introduce an undrained residual fault shear strength ru (function of dilatancy) and show theoretically that under the assumption of small-scale yielding, an otherwise unstable fault ((r)<(o)) is stabilized when ru is larger than (o). We numerically solve the complete coupled hydromechanical problem and confirm this theoretical estimate. It is important to note that the undrained residual strength is fully activated only if residual friction is reached. Dilatancy stabilizes an otherwise unstable fault if the nucleation of an unabated dynamic rupturewithout dilatancyis affected by residual friction, which is the case for sufficiently large injection pressure. We also discuss the effect of fault permeability increase due to slip. Our numerical results show that permeability increases lead to faster aseismic growth but do not impact the stabilizing effect of dilatancy with respect to dynamic rupture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据