4.6 Article

Momentum Drag Effect Over Urbanized Areas in the ACM2 PBL Component of the WRF model

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
卷 124, 期 8, 页码 4460-4476

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018JD029333

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC [41575106]
  2. RGC [16300715]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesoscale meteorology models, such as theWeather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, typically use land use categorization data to specify surface characteristics by grid cells. In commonly used land use schemes, such as the 24-class U. S. Geological Survey land use classification system or the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer landcover product, cities are placed in single urban categories that are characterized by a high roughness length. Monin-Obunkov similarity theory is commonly used to simulate boundary layer dynamics based on surface energy and momentum fluxes which resulted in an overprediction of wind speed in weather forecasts for urban areas. It is thus crucial to include the momentum drag effects of the buildings, including walls and roofs, in the prediction models. The WRF model contains several momentum flux parameterizations, including the single-layer urban canopy model, building effect parameterization, and building energy model. The building energy model and building effect parameterization schemes are limited to the Mellor-Yamada-Janjic or BouLac planetary boundary layer models and are computationally costly. In this study, a realistic multilayer urban approach is introduced into the Asymmetric Convective Model version 2 planetary boundary layer component of the WRF model. Sensitivity tests are applied to a range of urban morphological parameters in idealized simulations, and the impact of building morphology on atmospheric conditions is examined. The modified Asymmetric Convective Model version 2 is implemented in two real cases in the forecast mode, resulting in significant improvements in wind speed prediction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据