4.7 Article

Nanomechanical single-photon routing

期刊

OPTICA
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 524-530

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.6.000524

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Innovationsfonden (Quantum Innovation Center QUBIZ)
  2. Villum Fonden
  3. Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (DNRF) (Center for Hybrid Quantum Networks (Hy-Q)
  4. H2020 European Research Council (ERC) (SCALE)
  5. Teknologi og Produktion, Det Frie Forskningsrad (FTP, DFF) [4184-00203]
  6. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) [16KIS0867]
  7. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [TRR 160]
  8. Styrelsen for Forskning og Innovation (FI) [5072-00016B QUANTECH]
  9. Villum Fonden [00013170] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The active routing of photons using rapid reconfigurable integrated circuits is a key functionality for quantum-information processing. Typical waveguide-based optical switches rely on the modulation of the refractive index, producing a modest variation of the phase of the optical fields. Mechanical motion of nanophotonic structures, on the contrary, can be tailored to produce a much larger effect, without introducing loss or emitter decoherence and operating at a speed matching the quantum memory storage time of the on-chip quantum emitter. Here we demonstrate a compact and low-loss nano-opto-electromechanical single-photon router, based on two coupled waveguides whose distance is adjusted on demand by an external voltage. We show controllable two-port routing of single photons emitted from quantum dots embedded in the same chip. We report a maximum splitting ratio >23 dB, insertion loss of 0.67 dB, and sub-microsecond response time. The device is an essential building block for constructing advanced quantum photonic architectures on-chip, towards, e.g., coherent multi-photon sources, deterministic photon- photon quantum gates, quantum-repeater nodes, or scalable quantum networks. (C) 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据