4.5 Article

Attribute reduction via local conditional entropy

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13042-019-00948-z

关键词

Attribute reduction; Conditional entropy; Local conditional entropy; Neighborhood rough set; Rough set

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61502211, 61572242, 61503160]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In rough set theory, the concept of conditional entropy has been widely accepted for studying the problem of attribute reduction. If a searching strategy is given to find reduct, then the value of conditional entropy can also be used to evaluate the significance of the candidate attribute in the process of searching. However, traditional conditional entropy is used to characterize the relationship between conditional attributes and decision attribute in terms of all samples in data, it does not take such relationship with specific samples (samples with same label) into account. To fill such a gap, a new form of conditional entropy which is termed as Local Conditional Entropy is proposed. Furthermore, based on some important properties about local conditional entropy studied, local conditional entropy based attribute reduction is defined. Immediately, an ensemble strategy is introduced into the heuristic process for searching reduct, which is realized by the significance based on local conditional entropy. Finally, the experimental results over 18 UCI data sets show us that local conditional entropy based attribute reduction is superior to traditional conditional entropy based attribute reduction, the former may provide us attributes with higher classification accuracies. In addition, if local conditional entropy is regarded as the measurement in online feature selection, then it not only offers us better classification performance, but also requires lesser elapsed time to complete the process of online feature selection. This study suggests new trends for considering attribute reduction and provides guidelines for designing new measurements and related algorithms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据