4.6 Article

Thermodynamic Performance Analyses and Optimization of Dual-Loop Organic Rankine Cycles for Internal Combustion Engine Waste Heat Recovery

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app9040680

关键词

dual-loop organic Rankine cycle; waste heat recovery; performance analysis; parametric optimization; exhaust gas temperature

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51736005, 51621062, 11461078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Waste heats of an internal combustion engine (ICE) are recovered by a dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (DORC). Thermodynamic performance analyses and optimizations are conducted with 523.15-623.15 K exhaust gas temperature (T-g1). Cyclopentane, cyclohexane, benzene, and toluene are selected as working fluids for high-temperature loop (HTL), whereas R1234ze(E), R600a, R245fa, and R601a are selected as working fluids for low-temperature loop (LTL). The HTL evaporation temperature, condensation temperature, and superheat degree are optimized through a genetic algorithm, and net power output is selected as the objective function. Influences of T-g1 on system net power output, thermal efficiency, exergy efficiency, HTL evaporation temperature, HTL condensation temperature, HTL superheat degree, exhaust gas temperature at the exit of the HTL evaporator, heat utilization ratio, and exergy destruction rate of the components are analyzed. Results are presented as follows: the net power output is mainly influenced by HTL working fluid. The optimal LTL working fluid is R1234ze(E). The optimal HTL evaporator temperature increases with T-g1 until it reaches the upper limit. The optimal HTL condensation temperature increases initially and later remains unchanged for a cyclopentane system, thus keeping constant for other systems. Saturated cycle is suitable for cyclohexane, benzene, and toluene systems. Superheat cycle improves the net power output for a cyclopentane system when T-g1 is 568.15-623.15 K.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据