4.5 Article

Risk factors for surgical site infection after craniotomy: a prospective cohort study

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13756-019-0525-3

关键词

Risk factors; Surgical site infection; Craniotomy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundAlthough surgical site infection after craniotomy (SSI-CRAN) is a serious complication, risk factors for its development have not been well defined. We aim to identify the risk factors for developing SSI-CRAN in a large prospective cohort of adult patients undergoing craniotomy.MethodsA series of consecutive patients who underwent craniotomy at a university hospital from January 2013 to December 2015 were prospectively assessed. Demographic, epidemiological, surgical, clinical and microbiological data were collected. Patients were followed up in an active post-discharge surveillance programm e for up to one year after surgery. Multivariate analysis was carried out to identify independent risk factors for SSI-CRAN.ResultsAmong the 595 patients who underwent craniotomy, 91 (15.3%) episodes of SSI-CRAN were recorded, 67 (73.6%) of which were organ/space. Baseline demographic characteristics were similar among patients who developed SSI-CRAN and those who did not. The most frequent causative Gram-positive organisms were Cutibacterium acnes (23.1%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (23.1%), whereas Enterobacter cloacae (12.1%) was the most commonly isolated Gram-negative agent. In the univariate analysis the factors associated with SSI-CRAN were ASA score>2 (48.4% vs. 35.5% in SSI-CRAN and no SSI-CRAN respectively, p=0.025), extrinsic tumour (28.6% vs. 19.2%, p=0.05), and re-intervention (4.4% vs. 1.4%, p=<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, ASA score>2 (AOR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.32-3.87; p=.003) and re-intervention (OR: 8.93, 95% CI: 5.33-14.96; p<0.001) were the only factors independently associated with SSI-CRAN.ConclusionThe risk factors and causative agents of SSI-CRAN identified in this study should be considered in the design of preventive strategies aimed to reduce the incidence of this serious complication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据