4.6 Article

Biodiversity seen through the perspective of insects: 10 simple rules on methodological choices and experimental design for genomic studies

期刊

PEERJ
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6727

关键词

Evolution; High-throughput sequencing; Insect genomics; Museomics; Taxonomic impediment

资金

  1. Marie Sklodowska-Curie fellowship [MARIPOSAS-704035]
  2. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico-Brazil) [249064/2013-8]
  3. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  4. Aage V. Jensen Naturfond of Denmark [1121721001]
  5. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [642241]
  6. Swedish Research Council
  7. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  8. Swedish Research Council [B0569601]
  9. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  10. Faculty of Sciences at the University of Gothenburg
  11. David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies at Harvard University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Massively parallel DNA sequencing opens up opportunities for bridging multiple temporal and spatial dimensions in biodiversity research, thanks to its efficiency to recover millions of nucleotide polymorphisms. Here, we identify the current status, discuss the main challenges, and look into future perspectives on biodiversity genomics focusing on insects, which arguably constitute the most diverse and ecologically important group among all animals. We suggest 10 simple rules that provide a succinct step-by-step guide and best-practices to anyone interested in biodiversity research through the study of insect genomics. To this end, we review relevant literature on biodiversity and evolutionary research in the field of entomology. Our compilation is targeted at researchers and students who may not yet be specialists in entomology or molecular biology. We foresee that the genomic revolution and its application to the study of non-model insect lineages will represent a major leap to our understanding of insect diversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据