4.5 Review

Small-Scale Mechanical Testing of Cemented Carbides from the Micro- to the Nano-Level: A Review

期刊

METALS
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met9050502

关键词

cemented carbides; WC-Co; micro; nano mechanics; damage; characterization

资金

  1. Powroty/Reintegration programme of the Foundation for Polish Science [POWROTY/2016-1/3]
  2. Research Centre of Advanced Materials and Technologies for Recent and Future Applications PROMATECH [APVV-15-0014, VEGA 2/0130/17, VEGA 1/0096/18]
  3. Operational Program Research and Development through European Regional Development Fund [ITMS 26220220186]
  4. European Union under the European Regional Development Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this overview, we summarize the results published to date concerning the small-scale mechanical testing of WC-Co cemented carbides and similar hardmetals, describing the clear trend in the research towards ever-smaller scales (currently at the nano-level). The load-size effect during micro/nanohardness testing of hardmetals and their constituents and the influence of the WC grain orientation on their deformation, hardness, indentation modulus, fracture toughness, and fatigue characteristics are discussed. The effect of the WC grain size/orientation, cobalt content, and testing environment on damage accumulation, wear mechanisms, and wear parameters are summarized. The deformation and fracture characteristics and mechanical properties, such as the yield and compression strength, of WC-Co composites and their individual WC grains at different orientations during micropillar compression tests are described. The mechanical and fracture properties of micro-cantilevers milled from WC-Co hardmetals, single WC grains, and cantilevers containing WC/WC boundaries with differently-oriented WC grains are discussed. The physical background of the deformation and damage mechanisms in cemented carbides at the micro/nano-levels is descri and potential directions for future research in this field are outlined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据