4.1 Article

Spatial scale influences diversity patterns of free-living nematode assemblages in coral degradation zones from the Caribbean Sea

期刊

MARINE BIODIVERSITY
卷 49, 期 4, 页码 1831-1842

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12526-019-00945-z

关键词

Nematodes; Coral reef; Species richness; Species composition; Biological traits; Dispersal; EiE hypothesis

资金

  1. Ocean Foundation though the Proyecto 3 Golfos Initiative
  2. Dalio Family Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diversity of marine nematodes in coral degradation zones (CDZs) has been poorly studied despite of its contribution to global coral reef diversity; additionally, effects of spatial scales on nematode assemblages are also largely unknown. To fill this gap, we studied the marine nematode assemblages in CDZs from two coral reefs in the Caribbean Sea to describe the diversity, test the effects of spatial scales, and explore if there were adaptive biological trait combinations. We sampled 2 reefs (Ballenatos and Punta Frances), 6 sites, and 20 dead coral piles in a fully nested design identifying the nematodes to species level. CDZs harbored a diverse nematode assemblage of 112 species with large spatial turnover. Differences between reefs in abundance and species density were probably related to differential energy availability, with Punta Frances receiving larger input of material and energy from land. The spatial scale had a significant effect on the species richness, whereas differences in species composition were mainly driven by the scale at which ecological drivers operated (10(-1) m for interstitial heterogeneity vs. 10(5) m for dispersal). Geographical distances in the order of 180 km likely constituted barriers to nematode dispersal and as such promoted assemblage dissimilarity. Our evidence indicated that a particular set of biological traits favored the adaptation of nematodes to CDZs, namely a distinctive combination of armed stoma, ornamented cuticle, and conical tail.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据