4.6 Article

Structural, Optical, Band Edge and Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Properties of Tin-Doped WO3

期刊

CATALYSTS
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal9050456

关键词

tungsten oxide; tin ions; photoelectrochemical water splitting; optical properties; band edge positions

资金

  1. Basic Research & Development program [NRF-2017R1D1A1B03035201]
  2. Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea
  3. Ajou University
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1D1A1B03035201] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The substitutional doping of tungsten oxide (WO3) with metal ions demonstrates a promising approach to enhance its photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting efficiency. In this article, the substitutional doping of Sn ions into WO3 lattice and its effect on optical, electrical, band edge, and PEC water splitting properties are explored. Sn-doped WO3 thin films were synthesized using a facile hydrothermal method. The characterization data reveal that the doping of Sn alters the morphology, induces multiple crystal phases, effects the crystal orientation, reduces the band gap, and increases the carrier density of WO3. With the uniform distribution of Sn ions in WO3 and the decreased charge transfer resistance at the electrode/electrolyte interface, the doped WO3 show notable enhancement in its PEC activity compared to the undoped WO3. The band edge study revealed that the introduction of Sn in WO3 lattice causes an increase in the energy distance between the valence band edge and Fermi level and, at the same time, induces a downward shift in both the valence and conduction band edges towards higher potentials with respect to reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE). Conclusively, this work shows significant and new insights about Sn-doped WO3 photoanodes and their influence on PEC water splitting efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据