4.5 Article

Triarylphosphine Oxide as Cathode Interfacial Material for Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
卷 6, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admi.201900434

关键词

cathode interlayer; interface engineering; organic molecule; p-i-n perovskite solar cell; semitransparent solar cell

资金

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
  2. OSR-CARF [URF/1/3079-33-01, URF/1/3079-35-01, URF/1/3079-36-01, URF/1/3079-37-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs) in the inverted planar p-i-n configuration often employ phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PC61BM) as electron transport layer, onto which Ag is deposited as outer electrode. However, the energy offset between PC61BM and Ag imposes an energy barrier for electron extraction. In this work, to improve the contact quality of this stack, a small organic molecule (2-(1,10-phenanthrolin-3-yl)naphth-6-yl)diphenylphosphine oxide (DPO) as a cathode interfacial material (CIM), inserted between PC61BM and Ag, is introduced. In devices with the indium tin oxide (ITO)/NiOx/methylammonium lead iodide (MAPbI(3))/PC61BM/CIM/Ag configuration, it is found that this results in fill factor (FF) and short-circuit current density values (J(SC)) that are up to approximate to 34% and approximate to 1 mA cm(-2) higher, respectively, compared to DPO-free devices. Inserting additional thin ZnO nanoparticle layers further improves the contact quality, leading to a power conversion efficiency of 18.2%. Semitransparent PSCs, utilizing DPO as an interlayer buffer layer are also realised. Resultant devices exhibit improved performance compared to DPO-free devices. This proves that DPO withstands the sputtering of ITO, and may thus find application in perovskite-based tandem devices. It is concluded that DPO acts as an excellent cathode modifier, opening new device-engineering opportunities for p-i-n PSCs, especially in their semitransparent implementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据